Comparison

Canneloni vs Cannelloni tubos precocidos

Overall, Canneloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCanneloniCannelloni tubos precocidos
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 354 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3 g 3.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 3 g
Protein 12 g 11.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Canneloni has 20% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Canneloni has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Cannelloni tubos precocidos has 100% more fiber (3 g vs 0 g).
  • Canneloni has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Cannelloni tubos precocidos is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Canneloni

Hartweizengrieß.

Cannelloni tubos precocidos

Sémola de _trigo_ duro, agua 12,5%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Canneloni or Cannelloni tubos precocidos?

Overall, Canneloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cannelloni tubos precocidos has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Canneloni has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons