Canneloni vs Cannelloni tubos precocidos
Overall, Canneloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Canneloni | Cannelloni tubos precocidos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canneloni has 20% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Canneloni has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Cannelloni tubos precocidos has 100% more fiber (3 g vs 0 g).
- Canneloni has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cannelloni tubos precocidos is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Canneloni
Hartweizengrieß.
Cannelloni tubos precocidos
Sémola de _trigo_ duro, agua 12,5%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Canneloni or Cannelloni tubos precocidos?
Overall, Canneloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cannelloni tubos precocidos has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canneloni has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.