Comparison

Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés vs Cannelloni Fiorentina

Overall, Cannelloni Fiorentina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCannelloni ricotta épinards...Cannelloni Fiorentina
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 146 kcal 145 kcal
Fat 7.8 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 2.1 g
Sugars 3.5 g 4.2 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1 g 1.4 g
Protein 6.4 g 5.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cannelloni Fiorentina has 18% less fat (6.4 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Cannelloni Fiorentina has 42% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés has 17% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Cannelloni Fiorentina has 29% more fiber (1.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés has 20% more protein (6.4 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Only Cannelloni Fiorentina lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés

Not available.

Cannelloni Fiorentina

lait écrémé, pâtes alimentaires 19.5% (semoule de blé dur, eau, _oeufs_ [de ponte au sol], sel de cuisine), eau, épinard 8.3%, _ricotta_ 7.0%, oignons, huile de tournesol, fromage à pâte dure 3.9%o, petit-lait en poudre, farine de blé tendre, panure (farine de _blé_, sel de cuisine), _beurre_ 1.90%, crème entière 1.0%, amidon, sel de cuisine iodé, épices

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés or Cannelloni Fiorentina?

Overall, Cannelloni Fiorentina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cannelloni Fiorentina has fewer calories: 145 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cannelloni ricotta épinards surgelés has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons