Comparison

Cannelloni vs Cannelloni atún

Overall, Cannelloni atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCannelloniCannelloni atún
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 116 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 5.4 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 1.4 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.8 g
Fiber 1.2 g 5 g
Protein 5 g 7 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedEggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cannelloni has 11% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 130 kcal).
  • Cannelloni has 31% less fat (3.7 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Cannelloni atún has 76% more fiber (5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Cannelloni atún has 29% more protein (7 g vs 5 g).
  • Cannelloni atún has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Cannelloni atún lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Cannelloni

Not available.

Cannelloni atún

Agua, leche pasteurizada, atún (11%), sémola de trigo, cebolla, concentrado de tomate, harina de trigo, aceite de girasol, queso, tomate (2%), almidón modificado, proteína de trigo, zumo de tomate, sal, gelatina, pimiento, vino, azúcar, clara de huevo en polvo, almidón de trigo, especias

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cannelloni or Cannelloni atún?

Overall, Cannelloni atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cannelloni has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cannelloni has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons