Callos con garbanzos vs Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel
Overall, Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Callos con garbanzos | Lasanya de verdures amb beix... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 5.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has 22% fewer calories (115 kcal vs 148 kcal).
- Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has 57% less fat (3.4 g vs 8 g).
- Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has 41% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.7 g).
- Callos con garbanzos has 29% less sugar (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Callos con garbanzos has 43% more protein (10 g vs 5.7 g).
Ingredients
Callos con garbanzos
Not available.
Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Callos con garbanzos or Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel?
Overall, Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lasanya de verdures amb beixamel has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Callos con garbanzos has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.