Caldo de pescado vs Caldo de pollo
Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pescado | Caldo de pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Fish | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo de pollo has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Caldo de pollo has no sugar, while Caldo de pescado has 0.5 g.
- Caldo de pescado has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Caldo de pollo has 58% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Caldo de pollo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Caldo de pescado lists: Crustaceans, Fish.
- Only Caldo de pollo lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Caldo de pescado
Agua, marisco (5,8%) [gamba (crustáceos), bogavante (crustáceos)], hortalizas (tomate, zanahoria, cebolla), pescado (2,1%), aromas naturales (contienen pescado y crustáceos), sal, especias, aceite de oliva.
Caldo de pollo
Agua, pollo fresco (33%), cebolla, puerro, apio, zanahoria, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pescado or Caldo de pollo?
Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldo de pescado has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.