Comparison

Caldo de pollo vs Caldo de pollo

Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientCaldo de polloCaldo de pollo
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 6 kcal 7 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 1.2 g
Additives00
AllergensCeleryCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caldo de pollo has 58% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Caldo de pollo is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Caldo de pollo

Agua, 2,3% pollo (90% carne de pollo, 10% grasa de pollo), 1,7% hortalizas en proporción variable (patata, zanahoria, cebolla, puerro, apio), sal, extracto de levadura, aroma, 0,1% aceite de oliva virgen extra, pimentón. Puede contener trazas de pescado, crustáceos y soja.* Gracias a su proceso UHT.

Caldo de pollo

Agua, pollo fresco (33%), cebolla, puerro, apio, zanahoria, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caldo de pollo or Caldo de pollo?

Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caldo de pollo has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caldo de pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons