Caju&Migdale vs Cashew & apricot
Overall, Caju&Migdale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caju&Migdale | Cashew & apricot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 442 kcal | 474 kcal |
| Fat | 18.2 g | 33.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 43.2 g | 26.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caju&Migdale has 45% less fat (18.2 g vs 33.4 g).
- Caju&Migdale has 22% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Cashew & apricot has 39% less sugar (26.3 g vs 43.2 g).
- Caju&Migdale has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Cashew & apricot lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Caju&Migdale
Not available.
Cashew & apricot
nuci pecan * 15%, sirop de agave*, migdale*, merisoare (merisoare, ulei de floarea soarelui, zahar), sirop de orez*, nuci caju*, seminte de floarea soarelui*, goji*, orez expandat*, scortisoara* 0,4%. * din agricultura ecologica.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caju&Migdale or Cashew & apricot?
Overall, Caju&Migdale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caju&Migdale has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 474 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew & apricot has less sugar: 26.3 g versus 43.2 g per 100 g.