Comparison

Caju&Migdale vs Baton Cu Lapte Și Unt

Overall, Caju&Migdale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaju&MigdaleBaton Cu Lapte Și Unt
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 442 kcal 435 kcal
Fat 18.2 g 16.8 g
Saturated fat 2 g 10 g
Sugars 43.2 g 57.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Protein 9 g 7.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caju&Migdale has 80% less saturated fat (2 g vs 10 g).
  • Caju&Migdale has 25% less sugar (43.2 g vs 57.5 g).
  • Caju&Migdale has 19% more protein (9 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Caju&Migdale has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Baton Cu Lapte Și Unt lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Caju&Migdale

Not available.

Baton Cu Lapte Și Unt

Zahar, LAPTE praf minim 32%, UNT minim 15% (LAPTE), pudra de cacao fara grasime, aroma de vanilie, conservant: sorbat de potasiu.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caju&Migdale or Baton Cu Lapte Și Unt?

Overall, Caju&Migdale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baton Cu Lapte Și Unt has fewer calories: 435 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caju&Migdale has less sugar: 43.2 g versus 57.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons