Cashew & apricot vs Goralki
Overall, Cashew & apricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cashew & apricot | Goralki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 474 kcal | 537 kcal |
| Fat | 33.4 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 26.3 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cashew & apricot has 12% fewer calories (474 kcal vs 537 kcal).
- Cashew & apricot has 87% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 20 g).
- Cashew & apricot has 27% less sugar (26.3 g vs 36 g).
- Goralki has 84% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cashew & apricot has 56% more fiber (6.9 g vs 3 g).
- Cashew & apricot has 12% more protein (9.1 g vs 8 g).
- Cashew & apricot has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cashew & apricot lists: Nuts.
- Only Goralki lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Cashew & apricot
nuci pecan * 15%, sirop de agave*, migdale*, merisoare (merisoare, ulei de floarea soarelui, zahar), sirop de orez*, nuci caju*, seminte de floarea soarelui*, goji*, orez expandat*, scortisoara* 0,4%. * din agricultura ecologica.
Goralki
wheat flour, sugar, vegetable fats (palm, coconut), cocoa coating 7.5% (sugar, vegetable fats: palm, shea; cocoa 17% with reduced fat content, whey powder (from milk), emulsifiers: ammonium phosphatides, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, flavouring), whole milk powder, cocoa 5% with reduced fat content, whey powder (from milk), skimmed milk powder, vegetable oil (sunflower), corn starch, chocolate 0.5% (sugar, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, dextrose, emulsifier: lecithins), emulsifiers (lecithins), flavourings, raising agents (sodium carbonates), egg yolk powder. May contain soy, peanuts, and other nuts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cashew & apricot or Goralki?
Overall, Cashew & apricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cashew & apricot has fewer calories: 474 kcal versus 537 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew & apricot has less sugar: 26.3 g versus 36 g per 100 g.