Comparison

Butterschmalz vs Spreadable

Overall, Spreadable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Butterschmalz	Spreadable
Nutri-Score	e	e
NOVA group	2	4
Calories	898 kcal	630 kcal
Fat	99.8 g	70 g
Saturated fat	62.5 g	28 g
Sugars	0 g	0.5 g
Salt	0 g	1.1 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	0 g	0.5 g
Additives	0	2
Allergens	Milk	Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Spreadable has 30% fewer calories (630 kcal vs 898 kcal).
Spreadable has 30% less fat (70 g vs 99.8 g).
Spreadable has 55% less saturated fat (28 g vs 62.5 g).
Butterschmalz has no sugar, while Spreadable has 0.5 g.
Butterschmalz has no salt, while Spreadable has 1.1 g.
Spreadable has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Butterschmalz is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Butterschmalz

Butterreinfett, 99,8% Fett

Spreadable

Milk Fat, Rapeseed Oil, water, salt, beta carotene

FAQ

Which is healthier: Butterschmalz or Spreadable?

Overall, Spreadable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Spreadable has fewer calories: 630 kcal versus 898 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Butterschmalz has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Butterschmalz vs Slightly Salted Spreadab... Kaergarden ungesalzen XL... vs Butterschmalz Spreadable vs Yeo Valley Salted Butter Butterschmalz vs Yeo Valley Salted Butter British spreadable butte... vs Butterschmalz Spreadable vs Tesco Salted Spreadable British spreadable butte... vs Spreadable Butterschmalz vs Tesco Salted Spreadable