Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką vs Remolacha rallada
Overall, Remolacha rallada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką | Remolacha rallada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | — |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Remolacha rallada has 56% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Remolacha rallada has 90% less fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Remolacha rallada has no saturated fat, while Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 0.4 g.
- Remolacha rallada has 65% less sugar (4.2 g vs 12 g).
- Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Remolacha rallada has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką
Not available.
Remolacha rallada
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką or Remolacha rallada?
Overall, Remolacha rallada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Remolacha rallada has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Remolacha rallada has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 12 g per 100 g.