Comparison

Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką vs Remolacha en rodajas

Overall, Remolacha en rodajas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBuraczki zasmażane z cebulkąRemolacha en rodajas
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group — —
Calories 71 kcal 32 kcal
Fat 2 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0 g
Sugars 12 g 5.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.8 g
Fiber 1.4 g —
Protein 1 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Remolacha en rodajas has 55% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 71 kcal).
  • Remolacha en rodajas has no fat, while Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 2 g.
  • Remolacha en rodajas has no saturated fat, while Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 0.4 g.
  • Remolacha en rodajas has 53% less sugar (5.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 40% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Remolacha en rodajas has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką

Not available.

Remolacha en rodajas

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką or Remolacha en rodajas?

Overall, Remolacha en rodajas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Remolacha en rodajas has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Remolacha en rodajas has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons