Comparison

Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką vs Remolacha en tiras

Overall, Remolacha en tiras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką	Remolacha en tiras
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	71 kcal	31 kcal
Fat	2 g	0.2 g
Saturated fat	0.4 g	0.1 g
Sugars	12 g	4.2 g
Salt	0.7 g	0.8 g
Fiber	1.4 g	—
Protein	1 g	0.7 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Remolacha en tiras has 56% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 71 kcal).
Remolacha en tiras has 90% less fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
Remolacha en tiras has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
Remolacha en tiras has 65% less sugar (4.2 g vs 12 g).
Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
Remolacha en tiras has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką

Not available.

Remolacha en tiras

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buraczki zasmażane z cebulką or Remolacha en tiras?

Overall, Remolacha en tiras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Remolacha en tiras has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Remolacha en tiras has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sliced Beets vs Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha en rodajas Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha roja en rodaja... Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha rodajas Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha rallada en hil... Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha rallada Sliced Beets vs Remolacha en tiras Remolacha en tiras vs Remolacha en rodajas