Comparison

Bulion warzywny vs Groentebouillon

Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBulion warzywnyGroentebouillon
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 91 kcal 5 kcal
Fat 2.2 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 11 g 0.5 g
Salt 16.4 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.4 g 0.3 g
Protein 2.2 g 0.2 g
Additives10
AllergensCeleryCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Groentebouillon has 95% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 91 kcal).
  • Groentebouillon has no fat, while Bulion warzywny has 2.2 g.
  • Groentebouillon has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 11 g).
  • Groentebouillon has 96% less salt (0.7 g vs 16.4 g).
  • Bulion warzywny has 79% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Bulion warzywny has 91% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Groentebouillon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Groentebouillon is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bulion warzywny

Woda, sól, cukier, przecier z cebuli 6 %, przecier z _selera_ 5 %, przecier marchwiowy 5 %, skrobia modyfikowana, warzywa suszone 3,2 % [cebula 2 %, marchew 0,7 %, _seler_ 0,3 %, pietruszka 0,2 %), ekstrakt drożdżowy, olej rzepakowy, koncentrat cytrynowy, przyprawy, aromaty, maltodekstryna.

Groentebouillon

Water, 31% groenten (bleekselderij*, tomaat*, wortel*, courgette*, prei*, ui*, erwten*, bladselderij*), zout, knoflook* specerijen* (komijnzaad*, zwarte peper*). *Van biologische oorsprong.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bulion warzywny or Groentebouillon?

Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Groentebouillon has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Groentebouillon has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons