Bulion warzywny vs Caldi de verduras
Overall, Caldi de verduras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bulion warzywny | Caldi de verduras |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 16.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldi de verduras has 93% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Caldi de verduras has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Caldi de verduras has no sugar, while Bulion warzywny has 11 g.
- Caldi de verduras has 95% less salt (0.9 g vs 16.4 g).
- Bulion warzywny has 86% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.2 g).
- Bulion warzywny has 86% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.3 g).
- Caldi de verduras has the better Nutri-Score.
- Caldi de verduras is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bulion warzywny
Woda, sól, cukier, przecier z cebuli 6 %, przecier z _selera_ 5 %, przecier marchwiowy 5 %, skrobia modyfikowana, warzywa suszone 3,2 % [cebula 2 %, marchew 0,7 %, _seler_ 0,3 %, pietruszka 0,2 %), ekstrakt drożdżowy, olej rzepakowy, koncentrat cytrynowy, przyprawy, aromaty, maltodekstryna.
Caldi de verduras
agua, hortalizas 29% (cebolla, zanahoria, col, espinaca, puerro, apio), sal, aceite de oliva virgen extra 0,13%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bulion warzywny or Caldi de verduras?
Overall, Caldi de verduras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldi de verduras has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldi de verduras has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.