Brown Sauce vs Delikatess Sauce zu Braten
Overall, Brown Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brown Sauce | Delikatess Sauce zu Braten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 97 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 16.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Mustard | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 73% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 97 kcal).
- Brown Sauce has 67% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Brown Sauce has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 96% less sugar (0.6 g vs 16.6 g).
- Brown Sauce has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Brown Sauce lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Brown Sauce
water, barley malt vinegar, sugar, spirit vinegar, modified corn starch, tomato concentrate, date paste, cane molasses, salt, tamarind paste, spice extracts (contain mustard), colour: sulphite ammonia caramel, paprika extract,
Delikatess Sauce zu Braten
Jodsalz (Salz, kaliumjodat), Reismehl, Stärke, Palmfett, Aromen (mit Gerste), Weizenmehl, Hefeextrakt, Karamellzucker, Zucker, 3,5% tomatenpulver, Verdickungsmittel Guarkernmehl, Gewürze, 2,4 % Zwiebeln, Maltodextrin, Säuerungsmittel Zitronensäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brown Sauce or Delikatess Sauce zu Braten?
Overall, Brown Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 16.6 g per 100 g.