Brodo di verdure vs Caldo de pollo
Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Brodo di verdure | Caldo de pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo de pollo has no sugar, while Brodo di verdure has 0.5 g.
- Caldo de pollo has 58% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Caldo de pollo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Brodo di verdure
Acqua, carota 1,1%, sedano 1,1%, aromi naturali, sale, cipolla 0,6%, piante aromatiche
Caldo de pollo
Agua, pollo fresco (33%), cebolla, puerro, apio, zanahoria, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brodo di verdure or Caldo de pollo?
Overall, Caldo de pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brodo di verdure has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.