British duck legs vs Cuisse de canard
Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | British duck legs | Cuisse de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 12.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 33.6 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuisse de canard has 38% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Cuisse de canard has 35% less fat (8.2 g vs 12.6 g).
- Cuisse de canard has 41% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- British duck legs has no salt, while Cuisse de canard has 1.4 g.
- British duck legs has 38% more protein (33.6 g vs 21 g).
- British duck legs has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
British duck legs
Not available.
Cuisse de canard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: British duck legs or Cuisse de canard?
Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuisse de canard has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuisse de canard has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.