Comparison

British duck legs vs Cuisse de canard

Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBritish duck legsCuisse de canard
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 250 kcal 156 kcal
Fat 12.6 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 1.4 g
Fiber 0.7 g —
Protein 33.6 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cuisse de canard has 38% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 250 kcal).
  • Cuisse de canard has 35% less fat (8.2 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Cuisse de canard has 41% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
  • British duck legs has no salt, while Cuisse de canard has 1.4 g.
  • British duck legs has 38% more protein (33.6 g vs 21 g).
  • British duck legs has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

British duck legs

Not available.

Cuisse de canard

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: British duck legs or Cuisse de canard?

Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cuisse de canard has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cuisse de canard has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons