Comparison

British duck legs vs 2 Duck legs

Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
British duck legs

British duck legs

Sainsbury's
a
2 Duck legs

2 Duck legs

Gressingham · 462 g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBritish duck legs2 Duck legs
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 250 kcal 247 kcal
Fat 12.6 g 15 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 4.9 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0.6 g
Protein 33.6 g 29 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • British duck legs has 16% less fat (12.6 g vs 15 g).
  • British duck legs has 20% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 4.9 g).
  • British duck legs has 14% more protein (33.6 g vs 29 g).

Ingredients

British duck legs

Not available.

2 Duck legs

duck

FAQ

Which is healthier: British duck legs or 2 Duck legs?

Overall, British duck legs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2 Duck legs has fewer calories: 247 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

British duck legs has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Slow cooked duck legs wi... vs 2 Duck legs Slow cooked duck legs wi... vs British duck legs Cuisse de canard x1 vs 2 Duck legs British duck legs vs Cuisse de canard x1 Cuisse de canard vs 2 Duck legs Cuisses de canard vs 2 Duck legs Cuisse de canard vs 2 Duck legs Cuisses de canard laqué vs 2 Duck legs