Comparison

Bresaola di Tacchino vs Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI

Overall, Bresaola di Tacchino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBresaola di TacchinoChiffonade bresaola NEGRONI
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 189 kcal 160 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 1.6 g
Sugars 2.1 g 0 g
Salt 4.4 g 4.2 g
Fiber 1.9 g 0 g
Protein 40 g 34 g
Additives32
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI has 15% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 189 kcal).
  • Bresaola di Tacchino has 41% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Bresaola di Tacchino has 69% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI has no sugar, while Bresaola di Tacchino has 2.1 g.
  • Bresaola di Tacchino has 100% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Bresaola di Tacchino has 15% more protein (40 g vs 34 g).
  • Only Bresaola di Tacchino lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Bresaola di Tacchino

Petto di tacchino, LATTE scremato in polvere, sale, proteine del LATTE, fibre vegetali (fibra di bamboo, fibra di patata), saccarosio, vino bianco, antiossidante (ascorbato di sodio), aromi naturali, piante aromatiche, conservanti (nitrato di potassio, nitrito di sodio).

Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI

Viande de bœuf, sel, dextrose, arômes naturels. conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bresaola di Tacchino or Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI?

Overall, Bresaola di Tacchino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chiffonade bresaola NEGRONI has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons