Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces vs Arrosto di manzo
Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièce... | Arrosto di manzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 228 kcal | 98 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arrosto di manzo has 57% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 228 kcal).
- Arrosto di manzo has 88% less fat (2 g vs 17 g).
- Arrosto di manzo has 90% less saturated fat (1 g vs 9.9 g).
- Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces has 22% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Arrosto di manzo has 26% more protein (19 g vs 14 g).
- Arrosto di manzo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces
Viande bovine 82% (origine France), eau, fibre de bambou 1,7%, sel, oignon déshydraté, amidon, arôme, dextrose, poudre de betterave rouge, huile de tournesol, extraits de levure, fibre de plantain 0,02%.
Arrosto di manzo
Carne di bovino, sale, destrosio, aromi naturali, piante aromatiche, antiossidante: ascorbato di sodio; conservante: nitrito di sodio. SENZA GLUTINE. SENZA LATTOSIO.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces or Arrosto di manzo?
Overall, Arrosto di manzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arrosto di manzo has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boulettes au boeuf, 15 pièces has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.