Bouillon à l'asiatique vs Knorr Chicken Cubes
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bouillon à l'asiatique | Knorr Chicken Cubes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 3 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | — |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 92% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Bouillon à l'asiatique has 62% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Bouillon à l'asiatique lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Bouillon à l'asiatique
Eau, pâte précuite 10% (semoule de BLÉ dur (GLUTEN), eau, huile de tournesol, sel), carotte 10%, courgette 8%, oignon, champignon noir 4%, sauce SOJA 2,6% (eau, graine de SOJA, BLÉ (GLUTEN), sel, vinaigre d'alcool, alcool éthylique, sucre), extrait de champignon, amidon de riz, huile de SÉSAME, ciboulette, ail, sel, coriandre, vinaigre de riz (eau, farine de riz), gingembre 0,1%.
Knorr Chicken Cubes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bouillon à l'asiatique or Knorr Chicken Cubes?
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.