Knorr Chicken Cubes vs Caldo de Pollo Frango
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knorr Chicken Cubes | Caldo de Pollo Frango |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 40% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Knorr Chicken Cubes
Not available.
Caldo de Pollo Frango
Agua, pollo 4,3%, sal, hortalizas 0,03% (cebolla, zanahoria), aromas naturales, almidón, carne de vacuno, especias. PÁgua, frango 4,3%, sal, legumes 0,03% (cebola, cenoura), aromas naturais, amido, carne de bovino, especiarias. 100 ml 250 ml
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knorr Chicken Cubes or Caldo de Pollo Frango?
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.