Knorr Chicken Cubes vs Caldo Cocido
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knorr Chicken Cubes | Caldo Cocido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo Cocido has no fat, while Knorr Chicken Cubes has 0.5 g.
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 49% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Knorr Chicken Cubes has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Caldo Cocido lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Knorr Chicken Cubes
Not available.
Caldo Cocido
Agua, pollo 1,1%, sal, aromas, almidón, hortalizas 0,2% (apio, puerro, cebolla y zanahoria), grasa bovina, extracto de carne, aceite de oliva, garbanzo 0,06%, especias, carne de bovino 0,02%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knorr Chicken Cubes or Caldo Cocido?
Overall, Knorr Chicken Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 4 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knorr Chicken Cubes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.