Comparison

Bolognaise classique vs Sauce for Bolognese

Overall, Sauce for Bolognese has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBolognaise classiqueSauce for Bolognese
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 82 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.8 g 4.9 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1.1 g
Protein 4.5 g 1.3 g
Additives01
AllergensBeef, PorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sauce for Bolognese has 45% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 82 kcal).
  • Sauce for Bolognese has 84% less fat (0.6 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Sauce for Bolognese has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Sauce for Bolognese has 16% less sugar (4.9 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Bolognaise classique has 27% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Bolognaise classique has 71% more protein (4.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Sauce for Bolognese has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bolognaise classique lists: Beef, Pork.

Ingredients

Bolognaise classique

tomato pulp and tomato concentrate (56%), meat 17,5% (beef 9%, pork 8,5%), water, vegetables 9% (carrots, onions 3%), salt, sugar, processed corn starch, parsley, sunflower oil, aromas, garlic,

Sauce for Bolognese

tomatoes (83%), double concentrated tomato paste (7,0%), onion, modified maize starch, sugar, salt, sunflower oil, basil, garlic, acidity regulator (citric acid), parsley, spice, natural suggestion flavouring, herb, serving

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bolognaise classique or Sauce for Bolognese?

Overall, Sauce for Bolognese has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauce for Bolognese has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauce for Bolognese has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons