Comparison

Blätterteigherzen vs Ficelles Tomates

Overall, Ficelles Tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlätterteigherzenFicelles Tomates
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 553 kcal 443 kcal
Fat 34 g 15 g
Saturated fat 16.8 g 9 g
Sugars 16.8 g 5.7 g
Salt 0.5 g 2 g
Fiber — 4.3 g
Protein 6.8 g 12 g
Additives12
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ficelles Tomates has 20% fewer calories (443 kcal vs 553 kcal).
  • Ficelles Tomates has 56% less fat (15 g vs 34 g).
  • Ficelles Tomates has 46% less saturated fat (9 g vs 16.8 g).
  • Ficelles Tomates has 66% less sugar (5.7 g vs 16.8 g).
  • Blätterteigherzen has 74% less salt (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Ficelles Tomates has 43% more protein (12 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Only Blätterteigherzen lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Blätterteigherzen

Weizenmehl, Palmfett und pflanzliche Öle (Soja, Mais, Sonnenblume, in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Zucker, Weizenmalzmehl, Speisesalz, Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren*), natürliche Aromen, Kann Spuren von Soja und Senf enthalten,

Ficelles Tomates

Farine de BLE, BEURRE, tomate en poudre (4%), levure, arome, LAIT ecreme en poudre, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, ail en poudre, sucre, origan seche (0.15%), piment en poudre, poudre a lever (bicarbonate de sodium), acerola en poudre (sur fecule de manioc).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Blätterteigherzen or Ficelles Tomates?

Overall, Ficelles Tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ficelles Tomates has fewer calories: 443 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ficelles Tomates has less sugar: 5.7 g versus 16.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons