Biscuit Spread vs LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - Creamy - 410g
Overall, Biscuit Spread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Biscuit Spread
LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - Creamy - 410g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Biscuit Spread | LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - C... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 565 kcal | 584 kcal |
| Fat | 35.2 g | 38.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 31 g | 36.8 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Biscuit Spread has 16% less sugar (31 g vs 36.8 g).
- Biscuit Spread has 22% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - Creamy - 410g lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Biscuit Spread
67% Caramelised Biscuits (Wheat Flour, Sugar, Vegetable Oils [Palm, Rapeseed], Sugar Syrup, Raising Agent: Sodium Carbonates; Salt, Cinnamon), Oil, Sugar, Emulsifier: Rapeseed Lecithins; Natural Flavouring, Acid: Citric Acid.
LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - Creamy - 410g
Biscuits caramélisés 58% (farine de BLÉ, sucre, huiles végétales (palme*, colza), sirop de sucre candi, poudre à lever (carbonate acide de sodium), farine de SOJA, sel, cannelle), huile de colza, sucre, émulsifiant (lécithines (SOJA)), acidifiant (acide citrique). *Huile de palme issue de plantations durables et certifies.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biscuit Spread or LOTUS BISCOFF à tartiner - Creamy - 410g?
Overall, Biscuit Spread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biscuit Spread has fewer calories: 565 kcal versus 584 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biscuit Spread has less sugar: 31 g versus 36.8 g per 100 g.