Bio Rinder Rumpsteak vs Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak
Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Rinder Rumpsteak | Delikatess Putenbrust - Clas... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has 21% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has 76% less fat (1.2 g vs 5 g).
- Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has 70% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no sugar, while Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has 0.6 g.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no salt, while Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has 2.3 g.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak
Rindfleisch
Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic
Putenfleisch, Jodiertes Speisesalz, Dextrose, getrockneter Glukosesirup, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Rinder Rumpsteak or Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic?
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Delikatess Putenbrust - Classic has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.