Bio Melange quinoa tricolore vs Quinoa tricolore
Overall, Quinoa tricolore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Melange quinoa tricolore | Quinoa tricolore |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 456 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoa tricolore has 89% fewer calories (48 kcal vs 456 kcal).
- Quinoa tricolore has no fat, while Bio Melange quinoa tricolore has 16 g.
- Quinoa tricolore has no saturated fat, while Bio Melange quinoa tricolore has 2.4 g.
- Quinoa tricolore has 90% less sugar (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Quinoa tricolore has 63% less salt (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bio Melange quinoa tricolore has 88% more protein (16 g vs 2 g).
- Quinoa tricolore has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bio Melange quinoa tricolore lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Bio Melange quinoa tricolore
Eau - quinoa blanc* 17,8% - sarrasin décortiqué* 8,9% - quinoa rouge* 5,9% - quinoa noir* 5,9% - GRAINES DE SÉSAME* décortiquées 3% - huile d'olive vierge extra* - graines de chia* 1,3% - sel marin. Traces de céréales contenant du GLUTEN et SOJA. Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Quinoa tricolore
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Melange quinoa tricolore or Quinoa tricolore?
Overall, Quinoa tricolore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoa tricolore has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoa tricolore has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 2 g per 100 g.