Comparison

Bio Leberwurst vs Leverworst

Overall, Leverworst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio LeberwurstLeverworst
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 334 kcal 293 kcal
Fat 30 g 23 g
Saturated fat 12 g 8.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 17 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Leverworst has 12% fewer calories (293 kcal vs 334 kcal).
  • Leverworst has 23% less fat (23 g vs 30 g).
  • Leverworst has 27% less saturated fat (8.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Leverworst has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
  • Bio Leberwurst is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bio Leberwurst

70 % Schweinefleisch*, 20 % Schweineleber*, Zwiebel*, Speck*, Meersalz, Gewürze (weißer Pfeffer*, Piment*, Muskatnuss*, Nelken*, Majoran*). *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.

Leverworst

38% varkensvleesª, 25% varkensleverª, varkenscollageenª, water, varkensspekª, aardappelzetmeel, voedingszuur (kaliumlactaat [E326], natriumacetaten [E262]), zout, suiker, varkenshemoglobine, dextrose, conserveermiddel (natriumnitriet [E250]), specerijen, kruiden, gistextract, preipoeder, zoethoutwortel, natuurlijk aroma, antioxidant (natriumascorbaat [E301]), stabilisator (difosfaten [E450]), zuurteregelaar (kaliumchloride [E508]).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Leberwurst or Leverworst?

Overall, Leverworst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Leverworst has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Leberwurst has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons