Bio Leberwurst vs Feestelijke leverworst
Overall, Feestelijke leverworst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Leberwurst | Feestelijke leverworst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feestelijke leverworst has 31% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 334 kcal).
- Feestelijke leverworst has 37% less fat (19 g vs 30 g).
- Feestelijke leverworst has 40% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 12 g).
- Bio Leberwurst has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bio Leberwurst has 27% more protein (15 g vs 11 g).
- Feestelijke leverworst has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Leberwurst is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Feestelijke leverworst lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bio Leberwurst
70 % Schweinefleisch*, 20 % Schweineleber*, Zwiebel*, Speck*, Meersalz, Gewürze (weißer Pfeffer*, Piment*, Muskatnuss*, Nelken*, Majoran*). *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Feestelijke leverworst
varkenslever 33%, water, varkensspek, varkenszwoerd, TARWEBLOEM, zout, dextrose, suiker, varkenshemoglobine, specerijen, gistextract, antloxidant: E316, specerijextract, conserveermiddel: E250
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Leberwurst or Feestelijke leverworst?
Overall, Feestelijke leverworst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Feestelijke leverworst has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Leberwurst has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.