Herkkumaksamakkara vs Leverworst
Overall, Herkkumaksamakkara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Herkkumaksamakkara | Leverworst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 239 kcal | 293 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 8.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Herkkumaksamakkara has 18% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 293 kcal).
- Leverworst has 35% more protein (17 g vs 11 g).
- Herkkumaksamakkara has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Herkkumaksamakkara
Porsaanliha (Suomi), vesi, 22% porsaanmaksa (Suomi), silava, kamara, jodioitu suola, sokeri, happamuudensäätöaine (E575), mausteet (sipuli), hapettumisenestoaine (askorbiinihappo), aromit, säilöntäaine (E250). LAKTOOSITON. GLUTEENITON.
Leverworst
38% varkensvleesª, 25% varkensleverª, varkenscollageenª, water, varkensspekª, aardappelzetmeel, voedingszuur (kaliumlactaat [E326], natriumacetaten [E262]), zout, suiker, varkenshemoglobine, dextrose, conserveermiddel (natriumnitriet [E250]), specerijen, kruiden, gistextract, preipoeder, zoethoutwortel, natuurlijk aroma, antioxidant (natriumascorbaat [E301]), stabilisator (difosfaten [E450]), zuurteregelaar (kaliumchloride [E508]).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Herkkumaksamakkara or Leverworst?
Overall, Herkkumaksamakkara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Herkkumaksamakkara has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leverworst has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.