Bio Granatapfelsaft vs Zumo de Granada exprimida
Overall, Zumo de Granada exprimida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Granatapfelsaft | Zumo de Granada exprimida |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 10.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo de Granada exprimida has 21% less sugar (10.3 g vs 13 g).
- Zumo de Granada exprimida has 83% more protein (2.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Zumo de Granada exprimida has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio Granatapfelsaft
Jus de grenade
Zumo de Granada exprimida
Zumo de granada
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Granatapfelsaft or Zumo de Granada exprimida?
Overall, Zumo de Granada exprimida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Granatapfelsaft has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zumo de Granada exprimida has less sugar: 10.3 g versus 13 g per 100 g.