Bio Granatapfelsaft vs Granavida 100% zumo de granada
Overall, Bio Granatapfelsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Granatapfelsaft | Granavida 100% zumo de grana... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 12.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Granatapfelsaft has 16% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Granavida 100% zumo de granada has 98% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Granavida 100% zumo de granada has 48% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bio Granatapfelsaft has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio Granatapfelsaft
Jus de grenade
Granavida 100% zumo de granada
zumo de granada variedad Mollar de Elche
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Granatapfelsaft or Granavida 100% zumo de granada?
Overall, Bio Granatapfelsaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Granatapfelsaft has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Granavida 100% zumo de granada has less sugar: 12.3 g versus 13 g per 100 g.