Comparison

Bio Energy Balls vs Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen

Overall, Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio Energy BallsEnergy Balls Feige Walnuss C...
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group — —
Calories 430 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 16.3 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 5.8 g 0.9 g
Sugars 34.5 g 46.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 16.7 g
Protein 12.2 g 5.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has 26% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 430 kcal).
  • Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has 47% less fat (8.7 g vs 16.3 g).
  • Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has 84% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Bio Energy Balls has 26% less sugar (34.5 g vs 46.8 g).
  • Bio Energy Balls has 57% more protein (12.2 g vs 5.3 g).

Ingredients

Bio Energy Balls

Not available.

Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen

81% getrocknete Feigen, 10% Chiasamen (Salvia hispanica), 9% Walnussstückchen.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Energy Balls or Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen?

Overall, Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Energy Balls Feige Walnuss Chia-Samen has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 430 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Energy Balls has less sugar: 34.5 g versus 46.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons