Big Mac vs Burger rustique
Overall, Big Mac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Big Mac | Burger rustique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 228 kcal | 308 kcal |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 20 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Big Mac has 26% fewer calories (228 kcal vs 308 kcal).
- Big Mac has 35% less fat (11.6 g vs 18 g).
- Big Mac has 19% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 5.1 g).
- Burger rustique has 55% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Burger rustique has 43% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Big Mac has the better Nutri-Score.
- Burger rustique is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Big Mac lists: Sesame seeds, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Big Mac
Pain (E932a, E471, E282, E281), Graines de sésame, steaks hachés (BŒUF), Salade, Oignon, Cornichon (E520, E433), Fromage fondu (Cheddar 51% orgine : Royaume-Uni (E330, E338, E450), eau, fromage (9%), LAIT écrémé en poudre, beurre, sels de fonte (E331, E330, E338, E450), protéines de lait, arômes naturels, sel, colorants (beta carotène, extrait de paprika), antiagglomérant (lécithine de tournesol) Sauce (Eau, Huile de colza, vinaigre d'alcool, cornichons, sirop de glucose-fructose, sucre, amidon de maïs modifié, jaune d'ŒUF, MOUTARDE (eau, vinaigre, graines de moutarde, sel, son de moutarde, sucre, caramel, curcuma), épices (dont moutarde), sel de cuisine, épaississant (E415), arômes naturels, extrait de levure, affermissant (E509, E15, E433, E211,EDTA) En quantités inconnues : Anhydride sulfureux et sulfites, Gluten (blé), Gluten (Soja), Graine de sésame, Lait, Oeufs, Moutarde
Burger rustique
Pain spécial aux céréales 44,7% [farine de blé origine France 17,8%, eau, flocons d'avoine 3,1%, farine de seigle origine France 1,6%, graines de lin brun 1,4%, levure, sel, huile végétale (tournesol et/ou colza), gluten de blé, son de blé, farine de malt de blé], steak haché pur bœuf de race charolaise cuit origine France 26,3%, mayonnaise [huile de colza, eau, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre, sel), jaune d'œuf, vinaigre, jus de citron concentré, sel], emmental 10,5%, tomates semi déshydratées et marinées 2,6% (tomates, huile de colza, sel, origan, ail),moutarde de Dijon 1,8% (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre, sel), moutarde à l'ancienne 1,8% (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre, sel), échalotes, vinaigre de Xérès, farine de blé, fond de veau (bouillon de veau, bouillon de bœuf, sel).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Big Mac or Burger rustique?
Overall, Big Mac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Big Mac has fewer calories: 228 kcal versus 308 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burger rustique has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.