Comparison
Biftecks sous vide vs Bifteck
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Biftecks sous vide | Bifteck |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 118 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifteck has 44% less fat (2.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bifteck has 21% more protein (28 g vs 22 g).
Ingredients
Biftecks sous vide
100% viande de bœuf d'origine française.
Bifteck
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biftecks sous vide or Bifteck?
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifteck has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biftecks sous vide has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Biftecks sous vide vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
Biftecks sous vide vs 2 steaks a griller
Biftecks sous vide vs Swiss beefburger
British beef ribeye stea... vs Biftecks sous vide
Biftecks sous vide vs Biftecks
Biftecks sous vide vs Steak boeuf *, à griller...
Bifteck vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
2 steaks a griller vs Bifteck