Comparison
Bifteck vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bifteck | 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloy... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 28 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifteck has 52% less fat (2.3 g vs 4.8 g).
- Bifteck has 65% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Bifteck has no sugar, while 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller has 0.5 g.
- Bifteck has 26% more protein (28 g vs 20.7 g).
- Bifteck has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bifteck
Not available.
4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller
Bavette d'aloyau de viande bovine (France).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bifteck or 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller?
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifteck has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifteck has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Steak boeuf *, à griller... vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
Biftecks sous vide vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
Biftecks sous vide vs Bifteck
2 steaks a griller vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
4 Biftecks de Bavette d'... vs Swiss beefburger
British beef ribeye stea... vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...
2 steaks a griller vs Bifteck
Bifteck vs Swiss beefburger