Comparison

Biftecks sous vide vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller

Overall, Biftecks sous vide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Biftecks sous vide

L etal du boucher · 240 g

NOVA 1

4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller

Picard · 600 g

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Biftecks sous vide	4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloy...
Nutri-Score	—	b
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	125 kcal	127 kcal
Fat	4.1 g	4.8 g
Saturated fat	1 g	2.3 g
Sugars	0 g	0.5 g
Salt	0.2 g	0.1 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	22 g	20.7 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Biftecks sous vide has 15% less fat (4.1 g vs 4.8 g).
Biftecks sous vide has 58% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
Biftecks sous vide has no sugar, while 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller has 0.5 g.

Ingredients

Biftecks sous vide

100% viande de bœuf d'origine française.

4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller

Bavette d'aloyau de viande bovine (France).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Biftecks sous vide or 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller?

Overall, Biftecks sous vide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Biftecks sous vide has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biftecks sous vide has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Steak boeuf *, à griller... vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'... Biftecks sous vide vs Bifteck Biftecks sous vide vs 2 steaks a griller Biftecks sous vide vs Swiss beefburger British beef ribeye stea... vs Biftecks sous vide Biftecks sous vide vs Biftecks Biftecks sous vide vs Steak boeuf *, à griller... Bifteck vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'...