Bifteck vs Swiss beefburger
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bifteck | Swiss beefburger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifteck has 40% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Bifteck has 85% less fat (2.3 g vs 15 g).
- Bifteck has 89% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 7 g).
- Bifteck has 89% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Swiss beefburger has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Bifteck has 54% more protein (28 g vs 13 g).
- Bifteck has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Swiss beefburger lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bifteck
Not available.
Swiss beefburger
viande de bœuf 73 % (Suisse), eau, fibres de tiges de blé, chapelure (farine de froment, sel de cuisine, levure, épices), sel de cuisine iodé, épices, arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bifteck or Swiss beefburger?
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifteck has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifteck has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.