Comparison
Biftecks vs Bifteck
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Biftecks | Bifteck |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 118 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifteck has 18% more protein (28 g vs 23 g).
Ingredients
Biftecks
Viande bovine fraîche protégée sous vide.
Bifteck
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biftecks or Bifteck?
Overall, Bifteck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biftecks has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 118 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biftecks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.