Biftecks vs 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller
Overall, Biftecks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Biftecks | 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloy... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Biftecks has 11% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 127 kcal).
- Biftecks has 52% less fat (2.3 g vs 4.8 g).
- Biftecks has 65% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Biftecks has no sugar, while 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller has 0.5 g.
- Biftecks has 10% more protein (23 g vs 20.7 g).
- Biftecks has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Biftecks
Viande bovine fraîche protégée sous vide.
4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller
Bavette d'aloyau de viande bovine (France).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biftecks or 4 Biftecks de Bavette d'Aloyau à Griller?
Overall, Biftecks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biftecks has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biftecks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.