Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète vs Smooth Peanut Butter
Overall, Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète
Smooth Peanut Butter
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner... | Smooth Peanut Butter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 614 kcal | 661 kcal |
| Fat | 49 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 13.2 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 29.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has 32% less saturated fat (9 g vs 13.2 g).
- Smooth Peanut Butter has 52% less sugar (7.2 g vs 15 g).
- Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has 11% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Smooth Peanut Butter has 28% more protein (29.2 g vs 21 g).
- Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has the better Nutri-Score.
- Smooth Peanut Butter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète
Cacahuètes torréfiées 81%, sucre, beurre de cacao, huile de tournesol. sel, extrait de vanille, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol
Smooth Peanut Butter
94% cacahuète, huile de palme, 1,2% huile d'arachides, sucre de canne, sel. Traces éventuelles de soja
FAQ
Which is healthier: Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète or Smooth Peanut Butter?
Overall, Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Be Nuts ! - Pâte à tartiner Cacahuète has fewer calories: 614 kcal versus 661 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smooth Peanut Butter has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 15 g per 100 g.