Comparison

Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli vs Ravioli cacio e pepe

Overall, Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBasil and Pine Nut RavioliRavioli cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 245 kcal 224 kcal
Fat 8.2 g 5.8 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 3.2 g
Sugars 0.4 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.3 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 8.8 g 9.9 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ravioli cacio e pepe has 30% less fat (5.8 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has 43% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has 89% less sugar (0.4 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has 28% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Ravioli cacio e pepe has 11% more protein (9.9 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli

Fresh Egg Pasta (45%) (_Wheat_ Flour, Free Range _Egg_ (23%), Durum _Wheat_ Semolina, Basil Paste (4%), Spinach (2%)), Ricotta Cheese (26%) (Cows' _Milk_), Whey Powder (Cows' _Milk_), Basil Paste (6%) (Basil, Sunflower Oil, Salt, Acidity Regulator: Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate), Potato Flakes, Sunflower Oil, Water, Pine Nuts (2%), Salt, Hard Grated Cheese (Cows' _Milk_).

Ravioli cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli or Ravioli cacio e pepe?

Overall, Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ravioli cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Basil and Pine Nut Ravioli has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons