Barres à la figue vs Sultana framboise
Overall, Sultana framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barres à la figue | Sultana framboise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 25.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sultana framboise has 43% less sugar (25.5 g vs 45 g).
- Sultana framboise has 41% more fiber (6.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Sultana framboise has 19% more protein (5.3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Sultana framboise has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Barres à la figue lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Barres à la figue
Farine de _blé_* 33,5%, sirop de glucose-fructose*, pâte de figue* 15,4%, purée de pomme*, sirop d'agave*, sucre de canne roux*, huile de tournesol*, _œufs_*, arôme naturel de figue, _lait_ écrémé en poudre*, sel de mer, acidifiant : acide citrique, gélifiant : pectines de fruit, correcteur d'acidité : citrates de calcium, émulsifiant : lécithines de tournesol*. *biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque, de soja, de moutarde et de graines de sésame.
Sultana framboise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barres à la figue or Sultana framboise?
Overall, Sultana framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sultana framboise has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sultana framboise has less sugar: 25.5 g versus 45 g per 100 g.