Comparison

Bacon Leverpostej vs Fransk leverpostej

Overall, Fransk leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBacon LeverpostejFransk leverpostej
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 247 kcal 179 kcal
Fat 20 g 11 g
Saturated fat 7.6 g 4.3 g
Sugars 1.3 g 3.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 11 g 12 g
Additives32
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fransk leverpostej has 28% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 247 kcal).
  • Fransk leverpostej has 45% less fat (11 g vs 20 g).
  • Fransk leverpostej has 43% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Bacon Leverpostej has 63% less sugar (1.3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Fransk leverpostej has 28% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Only Fransk leverpostej lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Bacon Leverpostej

Griselever 31%, vand, røget grisespæk, grisespæk, hvedemel, bacon 5% (grisebryst, vand, salt, konserveringsmiddel: E250, E252), skummetmælkspulver, løg, salt, ansjoser, gærekstrakt, krydderier, sukker, røgaroma, grisefond, konserveringsmiddel: sorbinsyre, antioxidant: natriumcorbat, stabilisator: E451

Fransk leverpostej

Griselever (34%), vand, grisespæk, hvedemel, skummetmælkspulver, løg, salt, sukker, gærekstrakt, ansjoser, krydderier og krydderurter, maltodextrin, krydderiekstrakter, konserveringsmidde!: Sorbinsyre, antioxidant: Natriumascorbat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bacon Leverpostej or Fransk leverpostej?

Overall, Fransk leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fransk leverpostej has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 247 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bacon Leverpostej has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons