Comparison

Backpulver vs Bicarbonate de soude

Overall, Bicarbonate de soude has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Backpulver	Bicarbonate de soude
Nutri-Score	—	—
NOVA group	4	1
Calories	86 kcal	0 kcal
Fat	0.1 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	44.8 g	0 g
Protein	0.1 g	0 g
Additives	1	2
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Bicarbonate de soude has no calories, while Backpulver has 86 kcal.
Bicarbonate de soude has no salt, while Backpulver has 44.8 g.
Bicarbonate de soude is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Backpulver

acidifier: diphosphates, up-and-coming powder: sodium carbonates, corn starch,

Bicarbonate de soude

BICARBONATE DE SOUDE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backpulver or Bicarbonate de soude?

Overall, Bicarbonate de soude has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bicarbonate de soude has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backpulver has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Bicarbonate alimentaire vs Bicarbonate de soude Bicarbonate de soude vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Bicarbonate de soude vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Backpulver vs Kaiser-Natron Backpulver vs Borwick's Bicarbonate of... Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire