Backpulver vs Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda
Overall, Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backpulver | Borwick's Bicarbonate of Sod... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 44.8 g | 69 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda has no calories, while Backpulver has 86 kcal.
- Backpulver has 35% less salt (44.8 g vs 69 g).
- Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Backpulver
acidifier: diphosphates, up-and-coming powder: sodium carbonates, corn starch,
Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda
Sodium Bicarbonate. May contain milk, tree nuts and peanuts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backpulver or Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda?
Overall, Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Borwick's Bicarbonate of Soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backpulver has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.