Comparison

Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire

Overall, Bicarbonate alimentaire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Backpulver	Bicarbonate alimentaire
Nutri-Score	—	—
NOVA group	4	1
Calories	86 kcal	0 kcal
Fat	0.1 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	44.8 g	0 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	0.1 g	0 g
Additives	1	2
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Bicarbonate alimentaire has no calories, while Backpulver has 86 kcal.
Bicarbonate alimentaire has no salt, while Backpulver has 44.8 g.
Bicarbonate alimentaire is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Backpulver

acidifier: diphosphates, up-and-coming powder: sodium carbonates, corn starch,

Bicarbonate alimentaire

Bicarbonate de sodium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backpulver or Bicarbonate alimentaire?

Overall, Bicarbonate alimentaire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bicarbonate alimentaire has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backpulver has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Bicarbonate alimentaire vs Bicarbonate de soude Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Bicarbonate alimentaire vs Bicarbonate alimentaire Backpulver vs Kaiser-Natron Backpulver vs Borwick's Bicarbonate of... Bicarbonate alimentaire vs Kaiser-Natron Bicarbonate alimentaire vs Borwick's Bicarbonate of... Backpulver vs Bicarbonate alimentaire