Comparison

Back-Camembert, classic vs Kritsinia me tiri

Overall, Back-Camembert, classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBack-Camembert, classicKritsinia me tiri
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 287 kcal 444 kcal
Fat 17 g 16.7 g
Saturated fat 7.4 g 7.8 g
Sugars 11 g 0 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 16.7 g
Additives30
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Back-Camembert, classic has 35% fewer calories (287 kcal vs 444 kcal).
  • Kritsinia me tiri has no sugar, while Back-Camembert, classic has 11 g.
  • Kritsinia me tiri has 28% more protein (16.7 g vs 12 g).
  • Back-Camembert, classic has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Back-Camembert, classic lists: Milk.
  • Only Kritsinia me tiri lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Back-Camembert, classic

Back-Camembert Classic: Wildpreiselbeeren: 66% Camembert; Mehl (Weizen); 48% Wildpreiselbeeren; Zucker; Sonnenblumenöl; Salz; Gewürze. Glukose-Fructose-Sirup; Geliermittel: Pektine; Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl, Xanthan; Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure

Kritsinia me tiri

Wheat flour, extra virgin olive oil 15%, hard cheese 11%, traditional leaven, water, yeast, salt. It may contain traces of sesame seeds and dried nuts (almond, walnuts)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Back-Camembert, classic or Kritsinia me tiri?

Overall, Back-Camembert, classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Back-Camembert, classic has fewer calories: 287 kcal versus 444 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kritsinia me tiri has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons